So nine days ago, I finally saw the
film of On The Road. I had posted a list of things I would be
looking for in the film. I’m ready to
talk. First—my short answers on what I saw. Second—in another post, my long questions
about the film. Here’s my original list,
and the short answers about what I saw.
How
much of the film is based on the scroll version rather than the finished book? Some. The scroll version is closer to the actual
events—and so is the film.
An
overall theme. In the book, Sal and
friends sense someone walking towards them.
At the end of the book, an old man with long white hair walks past
Kerouac in a parking lot and says, “Go moan for man.” Is anything like this included in the movie? No. The theme of the film seems to be Dean’s
irresponsibility.
Is
Dean Moriarty presented as a new American saint, an irresponsible sociopath,
or…?
In keeping with what I just said, Dean is presented as almost completely
irresponsible. At a poetry reading last
Thursday, in the wake of the film, I heard one poet sharply denounce Neal Cassady
(ie. Dean).
The
relationship between Mary Lou and Camille.
Kristen Stewart has suggested that her character (Mary Lou) is the pivot
of the film. But the novel exists in a
tension between the two. I can see why Kristen Stewart (“Luann”) felt
she was the pivotal character; she appeared as Dean’s soul mate while Kirsten
Dunst (“Camille”) was relegated to a minor role.
What
is the role of Carlo Marx? One film
reviewer has said: “Lose Carlo!” Is Carlo a true prophet? A true poet?
A bore? Pretentious? Carlo was portrayed
as doting and clingy, following Dean around.
His prophetic voice has been removed.
How
do they handle that brothel scene in Mexico…? Superficially, like much else.
Speaking
of Mexico—How does the film portray minorities in general? More specifically, Mexicans and Blacks? We
seem impersonal, societal references: A
sign on a gas station that says “We serve whites only”—and a sign at a roadside
grocery that says “We do not sell alcohol to Indians.” That’s it.
Neither of those signs are in the book.
What
about sexism? Do men utterly run the
show?
Pretty much, although Camille does seems pretty independent. We see the women scrubbing Bull Lee’s floors.
How
are the 1940s presented? How well does
the film represent the 1940s, and does it matter? Though the book is set in 1947-51, most
people associate it with the mid-to-late 1950s, when the book first
appeared.
We hear bop and see weird jazz musicians. We hear passing remarks about President
Truman. That’s it.
How
homo- or bi-sexual is the book? How
sexual is the relationship between Sal and Dean? Not
very. Can’t tell how Dean feels about
Carlo. Dean does try to get money out of a gay man by offering sex (That scene is in the scroll version).
How does
Old Bull Lee and family come across?
Funny?? Disturbing? Simply weird? Weird—but not nearly
weird enough(!).
Does
the film include Sal’s vision, in San Francisco, of reincarnation and nonlinear
time?
Nope.
How
does the film deal with Sal’s relationship to his mother? Significant, but not
significant enough. But the family is French-Canadian, as in real life.
How
is America presented?
America??
Does
Dean care about anything besides sex and kicks? He cares about his
children, apparently. Maybe.
How many people and events are cut
out of the movie?? Oh…lots.
But then, the novel includes a lot of characters in very minor roles.
So.
Those are the short answers. Stay tuned for the long questions!
No comments:
Post a Comment