As I get further and further into watching films about Quentin Crisp, I realize the depth of the questions raised here.
Now you may ask, “Why should any of us care about
Quentin Crisp?” For myself I can say
that I was profoundly affected by watching The
Naked Civil Servant. And why was that?
It was that a man who was profoundly different—because
homosexual and effeminate—chose to live openly and take the consequences. He believed that people didn’t understand
effeminate homosexuals and so feared them.
He was determined to show people that effeminate homosexuals were
nothing to be afraid of.
But here, already, we run into a quandary. He was indeed no one to be afraid of. He was beaten up by men, or gangs of men, on
multiple occasions. He always remained
polite, considerate—and never hit back.
After release of the film The
Naked Civil Servant he was asked, “So you never struck back because that
would have reduced you to their level?” and he replied, “Oh no. I never hit back because they would have
killed me.”
Having grown up in the time of Martin Luther King,
and having also been deeply affected by watching the film Gandhi, the idea of standing against oppression appealed to
me. The idea of non-violent resistance
appealed to me.
But Quentin avoided “movements.” He did not attempt political action. He simply asserted who he was, and took the
consequences. This strikes me as much
more problematical. And yet this idea
exerted a strong influence on me in the years after I learned about Quentin. And yet:
Had any of his attackers actually killed
Quentin, we would probably never have heard of him.
I’m currently rewatching the sequel to The Naked Civil Servant. More on that shortly.
No comments:
Post a Comment